Here it comes

Wait for it,,,,,,,,,Wait for it,,,,,,,,,Wait for it

Fight the Ignorance - Not the Boot

I recently came across a website called FIGHTHTEBOOT.COM where the owner of the website states that he was unjustly booted because he parked on private property right in front of a sign and did not pay a measly two dollars for the parking spot and then was booted. Watch the video hereThe owner of the car then decided he was not going to pay for the removal, purchased a lock cutter, and in front of a local news channel while on video proceeded to cut the lock off. He then cry’s “he’s running a racket here” notice the next shot is one of his car parked right in front of the sign. That sign reads “there is no free parking available for subway. If you choose to park here you must pay at the box. At the end of the video he decides to make a note. Dick ever heard of “presumption of innocence”? Innocent until proven guilty? Private land or not, the owner does not have the right to contract out vigilantes to prey upon people like this. This is not a parking control. It’s a money grab. Please grow a brain. The fact the fees are 25x more than the price of the parking lot should be a clue here as to what is going on. Arbitrary fees are illegal here. Furthermore, to side with the boot man is to agree that “due process” and the right to appeal need not apply here. Isn’t that kind of self defeating?

Now that I have stopped laughing lets break that down.

Dick ever heard of “presumption of innocence”? Innocent until proven guilty?

This is not a court, your are not being charged with a crime, the property owner is enforcing his parking rules.

Private land or not, the owner does not have the right to contract out vigilantes to prey upon people like this.

Its private property! if you want to park there you have to abide by his rules and pay the machine if not you get booted.

This is not a parking control. It’s a money grab. Please grow a brain. The fact the fees are 25x more than the price of the parking lot should be a clue here as to what is going on.

Will you ever park in that parking lot again? That’s called parking control. The fee has to be one that will correct the action, if you only charge those 2 dollars after the fact, and then people will try to get away with it thinking if I get caught then I still only have to pay two dollars.

Arbitrary fees are illegal here.

This is not based on a whim or chance you decided to park and not pay. It’s the owners property not your therefore you have no say. They’re recovering fee’s

Furthermore, to side with the boot man is to agree that “due process” and the right to appeal need not apply here. Isn’t that kind of self defeating?

Stop trying to be the victim here. Due process and the right to appeal refer to a criminal judgment, or criminal charges, not a civil matter. You should have called the police got the guys information, paid the fee and then tried to recover it in civil court. But you didn’t, you decided to take it into your own hands, isn’t that what got you booted in the first place? Now that is self-defeating.

NMtruthteller does believe that the boot man should have more pay options, should give a receipt, have a business name and business license. Ultimately this is a civil matter and should be handled as such. We believe that the police should be called only to keep the peace, and obtain information if necessary.

There’s more to this story check in later

To be continued

THE RETURN

I'm back sorry it took so long but I've been working for a living. I've been getting alot of phone calls and emails about alot of stuff........lmao that never gets old. I have some new stuff for you guys so stay tuned

psycho test for guards coming??

The RLD during a special meeting on June 16, 2009 stated that they are obligated in having Security officers take a psychological test like police officers have to do as a requirment for level 3 licensure with the RLD. All the specifics have not been smoothed out yet but the RLD will be trying to enact the rules and specifics by July 1, 2009. grandfathered level 3 guards will possibly also have to take a one time test or maybe not.

I wanna know how much is this going to cost????? and who do they expect to pay this on a $9.50 an hour pay?? if this is going to happen will companies and the security industy in new mexico suffer greatly??

Are the company owners gonna have to take one also? because I have one in mind that should be at the top of the list. maybe he can write a report on how to pass it cuase I dont know how he passed the bernalillo county sherrifs one but he did.

you asked for it here I am!!!!!!!!!!!

poeple wanna know who NMtruthteller is!!!!

Ill give you a hint and you will have to tune in for my next post where ill post a picture of myself for everyone to see....


HINT name = Mil Mascaras

UNLIKE ROB HAMIC

Unlike Rob Hamic who posted this comment "Do your research, moron. He was previously licensed as an armed guard with a FA card. It expired just as the new law passed. He is now 21, a PPO and has a Level 3 certification. Way to uncover the facts. LOL" in response to our entry about how he was seeking special treatment from the RLD in the past. This blog will post your comment as long as they are not just your usual crazy rants and improper language Mr. Hamic. unlike your blog where its a one sided story and if it makes summit look bad but is the truth, you ain't posting it.

Answer this for me then Mr. landavazo was working for you while he was under the age of 18?? if not you need to change you blog HERE where you state "I received the tip and investigation from Anthony Landavazo who is the co-owner of Overwatch Security based in Albuquerque New Mexico. He and his partner, Jared Pirkle, worked for me at Summit Security for quite some time and then went to work for ASA Security. ASA promised them higher pay around June of 2007. They were patrol officers, which required them to work shifts driving around in their own personal cars, looking for bad guys at ASA Security's clients properties in Albuquerque. While working there, they discovered that things weren't right." notice it says they left your company in June 2007 the request you made for him was in august 2008 when he was 19. So that would make him 18 around June 2007 and he worked for you for ....how did you say it " He and his partner, Jared Pirkle, worked for me at Summit Security for quite some time" how long did he work for you? because I have worked for my boss for 9 years and that's quite some time!!! so if he worked quite some time lets say that's two years, he would have been 16. come on Mr. Hamic stop already with the lies and deception this blog is exposing you for what you are ....

This blog doesn't dispute that Mr. landavazo is current today and has no issue with that. what this blog has an issue with is how you were seeking special treatment back then and now criticize people when they do the same things you are known for doing like changing company names for owing taxes on a company you were a owner of. You may try to say that it was part of a settlement that you inherited the tax liens but the fact is that you were an owner of the company and still owe them. You can also say that you left Albuquerque to insure that your children were safe because Albuquerque is such a bad place but the truth is that your running from your tax liens.

Mr. hamic Albuquerque cant be that bad for a bad ass like you who would put three bullets in bad guys heads as per one of your training videos found here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bho6sqcDchs